| London Borough of Ealing |
In favour of Option 2 |
| Committee Report 12 to Transport Sub Committee "It is RECOMMENDED that the Sub-Committee agree to recommend to L.B.
Hammersmith and Fulham that Hammersmith Bridge be open for buses, cycles and pedestrians
only."
|
|
| London Borough of Hounslow |
In favour of Option 2 |
| LB
Hounslow Environmental Services Committee Report ESC/98/32. Supporting
Option 2.
| 2.0 |
Recommendations |
| 2.1 |
That the comments made in this report,
together with any made by the Committee comprise the Council's response to the
consultation. The main points being- |
|
The closure of Hammersmith Bridge to general traffic has brought
significant benefits to public transport operations with faster and more reliable bus
services in the vicinity of the bridge;
|
|
Although there has been some increase in traffic in Hounslow, this
has been confined to trunk roads;
|
|
The high level of priority given to public transport since the
closure of the bridge to general traffic is an example of measures that will need to be
taken if sustainability and air quality targets are to be achieved, and is therefore to be
welcomed.
|
| 2.2 |
That the Council therefore supports
Hammersmith and Fulham's Option 2 - To restrict further use of the bridge to public
transport, cyclists, pedestrians, etc. |
|
|
|
| Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea |
No view at this time |
| The Highways and Traffic Committee on 16 June 1998 agreed to make the
following recommendation; Recommendation 6.1
The Committee is RECOMMENDED to support at this stage the
permanent closure of Hammersmith Bridge to general traffic, subject to the outcome of
further work outlined in 5.1, and that the continued monitoring of traffic flows in the
south of the Borough continues to show no increase there.
The ESEC at a meeting on 30 June 1998, however decided, on behalf
of the Council not to take a view at this stage.
|
|
| London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames |
In favour of Option 2 |
| Committee Report 4 to Planning and Transport Committee. Recommending Option 2 with caveats that the problems of commuter parking
and rat-running traffic would need to be tackled.
|
|
| Wandsworth Borough Council |
In favour of Option 1 |
| Regeneration and Transport Committee- 16th June 1998; Paper no
98/390 "Wandsworth Borough Council has consulted
residents and businesses of the Putney and Roehampton areas on the future use of
Hammersmith Bridge following completion of the strengthening works. A total of 4,225
respondents (83%) have voted in favour of re-opening the bridge to its former capacity and
846 respondents (17%) have voted to keep it closed to cars. Residents have expressed their
concerns about the increased congestion in their area that has been caused by the closure
of Hammersmith Bridge to cars and about the associated increase in pollution levels.
Wandsworth Council objects to any permanent change in the Traffic Management Order
covering the use of the Bridge and asks Hammersmith and Fulham Council to ensure that the
repair works to the Bridge are completed as quickly as practicable and that it be returned
to it's former 7.5 tonne operating capacity immediately upon completion of those
repairs." |
|